LinkedIn Facebook Instagram Bluesky Bluesky RSS RSS
A view of the Yangtze River at sunset from above, while cargo ships traverse the water.
The Yangtze River flows under the Kuimen Bridge and past Ziyang City while cargo ships traverse its waters. (Image: Yux Xiang/Unsplash)

Five Years Into a Fishing Ban, the Yangtze River Is Teeming With Life

A doubling of fish biomass along Asia’s longest river shows hope for large-scale conservation efforts and a lifeline for the endangered finless porpoise.

The Yangtze River flows under the Kuimen Bridge and past Ziyang City while cargo ships traverse its waters. (Image: Yux Xiang/Unsplash)

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Flowing almost 4,000 miles from the Tibetan Plateau to the East China Sea, the Yangtze is China’s “Mother River.” From the emerald-green rice paddies of Hunan to the industrial hubs of Wuhan and Shanghai, the river basin generates 40 percent of the nation’s economic output. Yet, 70 years of rapid development had, until recently, wreaked havoc on its delicate marine ecosystem.

Fish biomass in the Yangtze has now more than doubled while endangered species are making a return, according to research released in February in Science. These early signs of recovery follow an unprecedented decade-long commercial fishing ban introduced in 2021. The findings suggest similar bold policies could catalyze ecological recovery in other large-scale rivers like the Mekong or the Amazon.

“I am always impressed by the resilience of nature when given space and time to recover,” said Steven Cooke, a fisheries professor at Carleton University and study co-author. “There have been other ‘restoration’ projects on rivers in the past but none have included a total fishing ban. That is unique.”

The Yangtze River Protection Law implemented a 10-year ban, running the length of the river, until 2030. It followed decades of biodiversity loss and the disappearance of 135 freshwater species — including the iconic Yangtze River dolphin and Chinese paddlefish.

Assessing fish stocks before and after the ban, an international team of researchers compared biomass and diversity across 57 sections of the river. They found a 209 percent increase in overall fish biomass and a 13 percent increase in species richness.

Larger fish — those longer than 7.5 inches — appear to have benefited the most, with their numbers increasing at the highest rates. This included species like the valuable black Amur bream — well-stocked apex predators are a critical indicator of a healthy food web. Migratory species like the slender tongue sole also appeared to be rebounding, finally able to reach critical habitats without being intercepted by nets.

For endangered species like the Yangtze sturgeon and Chinese sucker, the ban brought immediate stock improvements. However, researchers were most excited by the Yangtze finless porpoise. The culturally significant marine mammal saw its population jump from 445 to 595.

“The improvements of conditions include both habitat and food for the iconic Yangtze finless porpoise,” said lead author and fisheries researcher Fangyuan Xiong. With more free space and prey, this mascot of environmental conservation and subject of ancient Chinese poetry appears to be benefiting most from the first-of-its-kind ban.

While the rise is primarily linked to reduced fishing mortality, other pressures have eased. Researchers highlighted improved water quality and a significant reduction in underwater noise from boat propellers.

However, despite the positive data, the report was clear that the long-term detrimental impacts of river fragmentation — caused by sizable dams like the Gezhouba and Three Gorges — will remain challenging for migratory species. Similarly, microplastics that flow freely into the river from highly populated areas present continued threats to biodiversity.

The success also came at a human cost. The ban required recalling 111,000 fishing boats and resettling 231,000 fishermen who had long depended upon the Yangtze for life.

“The biggest take home is let’s do a better job of managing our freshwater rivers so we never have to consider full fishing bans as the medicine,” said Cooke. “Although this seems to have been effective here, the collateral damage to fishing communities is immense.”

Now entering its sixth year, the ban is not a permanent fix nor a cure to all ecological issues. Yet the doubling of biomass is a historic milestone.

“This is not comparable to any other conservation measure because it is the first basin-wide initiative on a large river,” said Sébastien Brosse, from the Center for Research on Biodiversity and the Environment in Toulouse. “Strong political decisions in favor of the environment have a marked and rapid benefit for biodiversity and ecosystem health.”

Nineteen years since the first seasonal fishing ban was implemented to protect spawning fish in the Yangtze, the extension through 2030 remains a bold strategy to restore one of the Earth’s most significant waterways, the study’s authors concluded.

Feature image credit: Yux Xiang/Unsplash